The Evolution Of Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility

By Asit Biswas, Cecilia Tortajada 19 March, 2020

Water gurus Biswas & Tortajada share their optimism on China's CSR & ESG landscape

The article was first published in Project Syndicate in December 2019. Click here to view.

Over the last decade, Chinese businesses have made significant strides in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues into their decision-making. But they still have a long way to go, and they will not get there on their own.

The idea of corporate social responsibility is relatively new in China. Among the Chinese public, CSR began to gain traction in 2008, after a magnitude 8.0 earthquake struck Sichuan province, killing 69,181 people, injuring 374,171 more, and leaving 18,498 unaccounted for. More than 15 million homes were destroyed, leaving ten million people homeless. The total damage was estimated at USD150 billion.

After the so-called Great Sichuan Earthquake, the Chinese public demanded that business contribute to the recovery. Companies responded, offering USD1.5 billion in support – and setting a new precedent for philanthropic CSR in China.

When Sichuan suffered another serious, though less devastating, earthquake in 2013, major multinationals were quick to offer support. Samsung’s RMB60 million (USD8.5 million) contribution, and Apple’s RMB50 million (USD7 million), confirmed that social responsibility had become an integral part of doing business.

As China’s new middle class flourishes, demands for CSR will only grow

As China’s new middle class flourishes, demands for CSR will only grow. Well aware of global norms and developments, middle-class Chinese expect safer products, better services, and a healthier environment. They are no longer willing to tolerate companies that prioritise profits over human and environmental welfare.

Recently, China’s govt introduced harsher punishments for co’s that fail to meet ESG standards…

…e.g. higher fines & jail sentences for officials

But, as powerful as public pressure is, it is no substitute for regulations. In 2006, Chinese corporate law was revised to include the concept of CSR, and the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges issued guidelines for disclosing CSR performance. More recently, China’s government introduced harsher punishments for companies that fail to meet ESG standards, including significantly higher fines and jail sentences for senior officials.

External rules have also helped. For example, in 2003, the European Union adopted new regulatory requirements on waste electric and electronic equipment and reduction of hazardous substances, which apply to the entire supply chain of any company operating in, or exporting to, EU countries.

Moreover, in 2016, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange made ESG reporting compulsory for listed companies. The HKSE followed up in 2018, when it introduced more stringent disclosure requirements.

From Jan to Oct 2018, co’s issued 1,676 CSR reports – an 8.5% YoY increase from 2001

These measures have had a powerful effect. From 1991 to 2005, Chinese companies issued just 22 CSR reports. In 2006-2009, the total rose to nearly 1,600. In 2018, that number was matched in just ten months: from January to October, companies issued 1,676 CSR reports – an 8.5% year-on-year increase from 2001.

Listed state-owned or state-controlled companies – which are more likely to incorporate the government’s priorities, from poverty alleviation to pollution control, into their business models – issue the most CSR reports. Government priorities are also reflected in the ways companies implement CSR: for example, in 2004, when China’s state forestry administration launched its “National Forest City” program, many companies focused their CSR efforts on tree-planting.

Yet as the number of CSR reports has risen, the share that can be considered good has declined

But the ESG record of Chinese business remains mixed, at best. For example, the quality of CSR reports varies widely, as do their rates of publication. And, in fact, as the number of CSR reports has risen, the share that can be considered good has declined.

This should not be surprising, since CSR reporting is still not mandatory, and there no penalties for failing to disclose ESG information, let alone for issuing poor-quality reports. Companies listed on the HKSE generally offer much higher-quality sustainability reporting than their counterparts listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen.

Local govts have remained focused on GDP & many provincial govts have openly protected their biggest corporate polluters

Local governments further undermine China’s ESG record. Despite Chinese President Xi Jinping’s  2012 declaration that economic growth should no longer be pursued without regard for its social and environmental consequences, local governments have remained focused on GDP. (A strong growth record can, after all, lead to promotions for Communist Party officials.) According to China’s former deputy minister of the environment, Pan Yue, many provincial governments have openly protected, and even actively supported, their biggest corporate polluters.

New regulations will make ESG disclosure mandatory for 3,000 of China’s listco’s & bond issuers in 2020

The good news is that this seems to be shifting, as the central government sustains – and, indeed, deepens – its commitment to ensuring that companies embed ESG objectives in their operations. Next year, new regulations will make ESG disclosure mandatory for 3,000 of China’s listed companies and bond issuers.

China’s CSR landscape has changed almost as much as its urban skylines over the last decade. But the next ten years should bring even faster progress. China’s people and their leaders are no longer willing to allow companies to shirk their social and environmental responsibilities.

Further Reading

• 5 Trends For The Year Of The Rat – Will the rat bring more outbreaks or will we get sunk like a drowned rat by water and climate risks? Or can we stay ahead with our wits and cunning to win the rat race? Find out what the lunar new year has in store for us in our 5 trends
• Dirty & Thirsty – Not Just A Paper Tiger – China is the world’s largest paper producer but the industry is a Top-3 polluter. Pollution crackdowns have led to cuts across provinces and water quality has improved. With rising enforcement, is this just the beginning?
• Top 10 CSR Trends For 2018 In China – 2018 is a landmark year for China on numerous fronts – what does this mean for CSR? SynTao highlights key trends to watch out for from their new report, including Xiong’An, the Greater Bay Area & mandatory disclosure
• Where Is The E In ESG Disclosure In China? – China is moving to mandatory environmental disclosure with a tentative 2020 deadline, but where are listco’s now? China Water Risk’s Dawn McGregor & SynTao’s Dr. Peiyuan Guo share 8 key takeaways from their newly released joint report, “CHINA PRIORITISES ENVIRONMENT: More Disclosure Needed To Match Rising Risks”

More on Latest

• Becoming Beautiful: Property Rights For Natural Resources – The Ministry of Natural Resources is creating a landmark rights system for each natural resource, from coal and gas to forests and water. What does this mean and where are the pilots? Find out in our review
• Greening The Yellow River For A Beautiful China – As President Xi reiterates the Yellow River’s importance, Dr Zhanfeng Dong from the Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning expands on policies for “黄河宁，天下平” – a stable Yellow River, peace in China
• Vast River Diversion Plan Afoot In Western China – With the Yellow River facing water shortages by 2050, talk of a diversion project has resurfaced – but should water be diverted from the Upper Yangtze watershed? Chinadialogue’s Baiyu Gao explores
• Sustainable Infrastructure: Towards A Diversified HK Water Supply – Are Hong Kong’s three current water supply “taps” good enough? Dr David von Eiff shares policy suggestions from Civic Exchange’s latest water report and examines the pros and cons of potential new “taps”
• Managing Transboundary Water Supply Risks: HK vs Singapore – Does Hong Kong’s commercial contract for Dongjiang water offer as much security compared to the international water agreement between Singapore and Malaysia? Chenlin Zhao from the City University of HK explains why