Are We Feeling the Shark’s Teeth?
By Francesca Recanati 18 September, 2020
With mounting material water risks, CDSB is working to better corporate water disclosure with a new guidance. Their Recanati expands
This article was initially published on the CDSB website on 25 Aug 2020. You can see that article here.
In 2020, the reality of this fact is clear with more frequent floods, droughts, and storms, alongside the consistent rise of sea levels.
Water mismanagement is a systemic risk to the global economy & that is so clear in 2020
Water mismanagement represents a systemic risk to the global economy. Water risks which have a direct impact on local economies can be caused by water depletion, pollution, poor infrastructure, lack of adequate regulation, and no transboundary cooperation among countries located in the same water basin. Indeed, a recent report by the Network for Greening the Financial System recognises that financial risks can be posed not only by physical risks to business operation and supply chains (e.g. due to water shortages), but also by water-related transition risks, for example government actions aimed at regulating the supply of available water through extraction restrictions or pricing.
Climate change exacerbates all these risk factors: the combination of climate-water-related risks creates a systemic risk to the financial system that can affect the productivity and predictability of supply chains, the impact asset valuations, and even the location of businesses.
What do we actually mean by water-related financial risk? Here are some examples:
- Over the next 80 years, coastal flooding would threaten an area with an economy worth up to US$14,178 billion, corresponding to about 20 per cent of global GDP, according to a recent scientific paper on Nature;
- According to the latest UN World Water Development report 2020, around 74% of natural disasters between 2001 and 2018 were water-related and during the past 20 years, floods and droughts caused total economic damage of almost US$700 billion;
- Companies reporting to CDP in 2019 revealed that 40% of their water-related risks are expected to occur within the next 1-3 years. About half of these companies (i.e. 520) disclosed financial estimates linked to water-related risks equal to combined value of US$425 billion;
- Financial risks are linked to the degradation of water ecosystems and the subsequent loss of their biodiversity can also be significant. According to the De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), of every euro invested by Dutch financial institutions, approximately one-quarter is dependent on ecosystems that provide groundwater and/or surface water (about EUR 350 billion).
As underlined in the latest CDSB blog by David Astley, “there will be no ignoring of climate change as its physical and transition risks and opportunities increasingly manifest themselves socially and economically in the coming years and decades” and so it is for water. If businesses can measure and manage water related risk they will be in a better position to weather the economic risk presented by the climate’s impact on water.
“Like a fish that doesn’t notice the shark until it feels its sharp bite, humans will first feel the effects of climate change through water”.
At CDSB we are currently developing application guidance for water-related disclosure, similar to the IFRS has to support application of accounting standards. This guidance will assist companies in disclosing material water-related information in their mainstream reports in line with the recommendations of the TCFD. It will be an additional, more practical, layer to the CDSB Framework and will integrate elements from the existing standards and frameworks for water-related reporting.
To better position co’s, CDSB is developing guidance for water-related disclosure…
…in line with TCFD
The focus of the guidance will be on water governance, water-related risks and opportunities and their management, sources of impacts, water-related performance, and future outlook (i.e. corresponding to the first six reporting requirements of the CDSB Framework). This guidance will be essential to help companies report water-related risks and their financial impacts to investors and will help providing comprehensive reporting on risks to shareholders as is required by law and expected under international accounting standards.
As a first step in this journey, we conducted a review of the literature on water-reporting to ensure that major existing resources will be considered and referenced in the guidance. The reviewed resources underlined four major aspects that characterise the reporting of water-related information:
- Need to consider and analyse the geographical location of water dependencies, i.e. where water is withdrawn, consumed or discharged. Levels of water stress depend on both water availability (or supply) and water demand, and the ratio between them varies from one water basin to another;
- Linked to the first point is the need to consider the socio-economic and regulatory context and of engaging with other water-stakeholders in a water basin. Water is a shared resource and ignoring what other water users in a basin are doing can pose a significant risk to business. Combining proactive individual and collective actions is a key tool in developing effective water management solutions;
- The selection of metrics is challenged by the need for a trade-off between basic and homogeneous metrics to allow benchmarking and more heterogeneous metrics that capture water-specific (and also company-specific) aspects such as geographical locations, time variability (e.g. seasonality), and dependencies of specific water sources (e.g. groundwater);
- Water-related issues are multi-faceted: they range from water consumption and degradation to damage to freshwater and ocean ecosystems. Additionally, water systems both drastically impact and are in turn hugely influenced by climate change, land-use change, and demography and other socio-economic and environmental aspects and trends. This multi-faceted nature makes water-related assessment and reporting exceptionally challenging, especially when it comes to materiality assessment and analysis of future scenarios.
Drawing from the results of the literature review and exploiting the expertise and knowledge of the CDSB Water Working Group, we will draft the first version of the water application guidance. To ensure its usability for reporting companies and usefulness for investors, the guidance will be tested by companies, discussed with stakeholders (e.g. investors and policy makers), and reviewed after an open consultation before being published next spring.
Interested parties can participate in the guidance consultation
We invite all interested parties to participate in a consultation on water-related disclosure, which will take part between December 2020 and February 2021. If you would like to learn more, or contribute to the development of the CDSB water guidance, contact CDSB’s Technical Manager Francesca Recanati, [email protected] , subscribe to our newsletter and follow our social media pages: Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook, YouTube.
- Capital Threats Remain Post COVID – There is no vaccine for climate & water risks, yet some in the financial sector are still burying their heads. CWR’s Dharisho Mirando reminds us how our capital is at risk & steps we can take to reduce them while going green
- Banking in the Age of Water Risk – Are water risks and their potential impacts factored in by banks? Or is ‘water exposure’ just the water used in their office buildings & branches? Tan says prudence dictates we must start to waterproof portfolios
- Banking On Granularity To Reduce Climate Blindspots – Climate & water risks are locational but most financial institutions are flying blind, not having mapped their assets. Until they do, they & our savings are exposed. CWR’s Dharisha Mirando expands
- Managing the World’s Liquid Asset – Water – Savvy investors now recognise water as a business risk yet there is still no agreed global standard & framework for sustainability reporting. Biswas, Tortajada & Chandler on why corporates & governments must do more to change the culture & mindset over the use of water
- Quantifying Water Risk: What’s My Number? – Industries are exposed to water risks but financial valuation of such risks remain elusive. China Water Risk’s Thieriot reviews existing quantification tools & methods and highlights gaps that need to be filled to put a number on water risks
- Valuing The True Cost Of Water – Water-related risks can be numerous for any given operational site. Nina Cambadelis & Johann Clere walk us through how Veolia’s tool, “The True Cost of Water” can mitigate risks and show potential economic gains
- Fashion Is Dead, Extreme Makeover Time – There have been 20+ bankruptcy filings in the last 6 months between brands & retailers. Surely, being broken can trigger an extreme industry makeover suggests CWR’s Dawn McGregor
- The Water Footprint Versus The Water Handprint – Corporate water stewardship is stalling. It is time to adopt a water handprint strategy with its positive and broader impact focus, seen already in the ICT sector, says William Sarni, Water Foundry CEO
- A Practical Approach To Factoring Climate Risk Into Financial Valuation – It is not a matter of ‘if’ but ‘when’ physical climate risks are appropriately taken into account. So, Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation’s solution are sector-specific Climate Risk Matrices as their Kathryn Bakos outlines
- Cow-free Milk Wins The Liveability Challenge 2020 – Food production is a major global challenge. A lab grown milk takes top prize in 2020 Liveability Challenge. See why & what other innovations placed from Eco-Business’ Robin Hicks
- Hong Kong & Asian Investors Jump On First Lever VC Asia Alt Protein Fund – Investor interest in alternative protein is at an all-time high and with a bullish Asia region. Lever VC secured USD23 million in capital. Green Queen’s Sally Ho expands
Read more from Francesca Recanati →