Where Is The E In ESG Disclosure In China?
By Dawn McGregor 16 May, 2018
China is moving to mandatory environ disclosure but where are listco's now? See CWR & SynTao's new report
|CWR & SynTao launch their new joint report, “CHINA PRIORITISES ENVIRONMENT: More Disclosure Needed To Match Rising Risks”. With China moving to mandatory environmental disclosure we thought it was a good time to take stock on where Chinese companies are on the Environmental aspect (E) in ESG disclosure. The report does this by looking at disclosure levels on the environment and three subcategories (energy, water & waste) for companies across six sectors (agriculture, automobile manufacturing, coal, electricity, oil & gas and smelting).|
A deep dive into the disclosure of the top five listco’s by market cap for each sector was also done and can be found in the report. The report can be accessed here and summaries in English here and Chinese here. Meanwhile, check out our 8 key takeaways below.
Why did we do this report? Well, environmental and water related risks have consistently been in the World Economic Forum’s Top Five Global Risks for the last eight years. Hurricane Harvey in 2017 cost the US between USD70-108 billion. Troublingly, climate change exacerbates these risks. Already their persistent and material impacts are shifting the regulatory landscape, which in turn is creating mainstream risks.
Persistent & material environmental risks are shifting the regulatory landscape…
…China recognising this is moving to mandatory disclosure
It follows then that the finance sector should be working on identifying, valuing and managing these risks so to build a resilient global financial system. While action to do this has started, the assessments are dependent on the underlying corporate disclosure, which is still lagging, largely inconsistent and not decision relevant.
China, facing serious environmental challenges and recognising the immediacy of the risks is moving towards mandatory environmental disclosure for its exchanges with a tentative 2020 deadline. This is necessary if the country is to embed environmental and water risks in its credit policies as it has said it wants to.
Given China’s actions we thought it was a good time to do a status check on where Chinese companies are on environmental disclosure. Check out our 8 key takeaways below.
1. China’s epic rise in global disclosure but still a way to go for all
A comparison of historic issuance of sustainability reports for China vs the United Kingdom & Northern Ireland (combined) and the United States shows China’s epic rise (see chart below). China has gone from its first sustainability report in 2000 to 652 reports in 2016; 100+ more than the US in 2016 and 300+ than the UK & Northern Ireland. Moreover, China is the only country of the three to strongly buck the slowing trend from 2014 to 2016.
China released its 1st sustainability report in 2012; this increased to 652 in 2016…
…100+ more than the US in 2016 & 300+ than the UK & Northern Ireland
These findings are not surprising given that China is moving towards mandatory environmental disclosure for its exchanges and that Chinese companies are in close proximity or among some of the greatest environmental risks with severe air, water and soil pollution in China. Not only are they feeling the impacts from this pollution but also the stringent regulations the Chinese government is implementing to clean-up.
While the increasing numbers of sustainability reports in China and globally are encouraging, there is still a long way to go before it becomes mainstream practice.
2. China leads move to mandatory environmental disclosure
China’s two exchanges (Shanghai & Shenzhen) have been pushing CSR/sustainability related disclosure since 2006. Then in 2016 China released the ‘Guiding Opinions on Establishing a Green Finance System’, which said that the country’s exchanges are to move to mandatory environmental disclosure. Since then a tentative 2020 deadline has been discussed.
All Chinese listco’s must disclose environmental information by 2020
The mandatory information disclosure system will be established in three steps before the 2020 deadline. Part of this system is already underway, led by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. In 2017, key polluting companies were required to disclose environmental information. Then in 2018, other additional companies have been required to either disclosure environmental information or to explain the lack of disclosure, similar to that of the “comply or explain” directive of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Then finally in 2020 (the tentative deadline), all Chinese listco’s will need to disclosure environmental information.
Other exchanges around the world are also acting on environmental disclosure (see table below for review of actions by key global exchanges). However, the central issue of voluntary versus mandatory disclosure remains. The majority of exchanges taking action is with a voluntary guide or a “comply or explain” directive, which is thus at the discretion of the individual company and does not effectively tackle the issue around mandatory or consistent disclosure.
3. Half of Chinese companies disclosing on environment; but some more than others
Positively, we found that environmental disclosure by Chinese companies increased year-on-year for the four year period analysed (see chart below left). Starting at 43% in 2012 and increasing to 56% in 2015, a CAGR of 6.8%.
The most significant increase was in 2015 where the disclosure rate increased by 6%, double that of 2014. This is not surprising given that it was in 2014 that China declared war on pollution, including a push for greater disclosure and transparency.
The majority of disclosure is only on 1 or 2 of the total 5 indicators analysed
(see chart above right)
However, while positive there is still clearly room for improvement. Especially since the majority of disclosure is either on 1 or 2 of the total 5 indicators analysed (see chart above right). Only 2 companies disclosed on all 5 indicators for the entire four year period; one in the automobile manufacturing sector in 2013 and one in the coal sector in 2015 (red bands in chart right above).
4. Energy, water & waste disclosure limited, but on the rise
A year-on-year rising trend was also found for companies’ disclosure on the energy and water subcategories. Of the three sub-categories, energy had the highest disclosure at 46% (see chart below left). As for water, it had a high of 40% in 2015 but only experienced incremental increases over the period (see chart below middle). Interestingly, despite different growth patterns, water and energy disclosure are largely similar for the four year period. There are two points to note from this:
Equal weight in water & energy disclosure reflects Chinese govt’s holistic policies
1) Water and energy carry relatively equal weight in disclosure for Chinese companies, which reflects the Chinese government’s holistic environmental policies & regulations; and
2) This equal weighting bucks the global trend where energy disclosure is usually markedly more than water.
Disclosure on the third subcategory, waste, while it increased, only reached 11%, notably lagging the others (see chart below right).
5. Sector rankings: Three leaders, two mid-performers & one laggard
At the sector level, we expected those facing greater regulatory pressure to disclose more and the trend holds. Analysis found three leaders, two mid-performers and one laggard.
Top 3 performers: coal (75%), oil & gas (75%) and automobile manufac. (72%)
Coal, oil & gas and automobile manufacturing are the top three with environment disclosure rates of 75%, 75% and 72%, respectively. They also are the top three sectors for all disclosure subcategories except in one instance, the waste subcategory, where oil & gas is joint bottom with agriculture. With clear and significant implications for air, water and soil pollution they face significant regulatory pressure, thus, their top performance is not surprising.
Somewhat surprising since they face similar regulatory pressure as the top three sectors is mid-performers electricity and smelting, with lagging disclosure rates of 47% and 48%, respectively. Meanwhile, agriculture is the clear laggard, disappointing on all fronts with only a 20% environment disclosure rate. Sector performance in each disclosure category is shown in the table below.
Though facing similar regulatory pressure, electricity (47%) & smelting (48%) disclosure lag…
… meanwhile, agri (20%) disappoints on all fronts
6. SOE composition & exchange listing trends
During analysis we also looked to see if company ownership and exchange listing influenced disclosure. We found that a higher State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) sector composition largely points to higher disclosure. This makes sense given that under the updated guidelines of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, all central-level SOEs are mandated to publish CSR reports.
As for exchange listing, we found that the majority of listco’s across exchanges have environmental disclosure rates below 50%. This is particularly the case for the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, where only 13% and 11% of lisco’s have equal to or above 50% environment disclosure rates. Comparatively, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange had 29% and Non-Greater China (exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange, London Stock Exchange etc.) had 50%. China’s shift to mandatory disclosure should remedy the Shanghai and Shenzhen findings.
7. Three chief challenges found during review
As still a relatively nascent disclosure type and with no consensus on the way forward, challenges in environmental disclosure are not unexpected. But they do need to be overcome as environmental, water and climate risks are here to stay and are only going to increase going forward. Case in point the extreme weather at the start of 2018 – a bomb cyclone in the US and hurricane strength winds in Europe. We encountered three main challenges during our review:
1) Incomplete data: Despite increasing numbers of sustainability reports in China and globally, overall ESG disclosure levels are still low. Only a small part of the picture is being presented;
2) Inconsistent data: The lack of a single standardised global framework impacts the consistency and decision relevance of environmental disclosure. GRI is the most prominent global framework but is not extensively used in China, which has its CASS-CSR/industry/SynTao guides; and
3) Lack of reliability: Unlike financial reports, third party audits are not mandatory for sustainability reports resulting in incidences of fraudulent reporting. According to SynTao’s database only around 4% of reports are audited and has been the case for the last several years.
8. Consistent & decision relevant disclosure is the way forward; plus investors want it
Mandatory consistent and decision-relevant environmental disclosure, which exchanges can drive, is the way forward so that environmental disclosure becomes mainstream practice. Indeed, there is increasing global discussion on the need to move beyond “boilerplate” disclosure. In China Water Risk’s investor survey, better accounting for water quality risks was just as important as complete and consistent disclosure: 94% vs 96%.
86% of surveyed investors want to see “mandatory disclosure required by exchanges”
Additionally, investors in the survey also felt that stock exchanges can do more with 86% wanting to see “mandatory disclosure required by exchanges”. This sentiment has also been seen among other investors, including Blackrock, Rockefeller & Co and recently major investor advocates like US SIF: Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment and UNPRI pushed the US Securities and Exchange Commission to require annual, uniform sustainability reporting from public companies.
China is indeed leading the move to mandatory environmental disclosure. It has to, in order to embed environmental and water risk into its credit lending policies, as it has said it wants to. While these are positive objectives, as found in this report, there is still a way to go before disclosure from Chinese companies meets this and reflects the rising risks. At the heart of many global supply chains, what happens in China has implications.
Decision relevant disclosure is key to ERA & building a resilient financial system
It is important that challenges be overcome and environmental disclosure levels improve as this data is key to advancing Environmental Risk Assessment work on quantifying environmental and water risks, and ultimately building a resilient global financial system.
- 5 Trends For China Green Finance – Stay on top of China’s green finance trends & opportunities with China Water Risk YuanChao Xu’s 5 key takeaways from China’s Green Finance Committee Annual Conference. From mandatory disclosure to ERA and One Belt, One Road to green buildings
- Top 10 CSR Trends For 2018 In China – 2018 is a landmark year for China on numerous fronts – what does this mean for CSR? SynTao highlights key trends to watch out for from their new report, including Xiong’An, the Greater Bay Area & mandatory disclosure
- Connecting Finance & Water Risk – Natural Capital Coalition’s Mark Gough & Joseph Harris-Confino on their newly launched supplement for the finance sector – see how can this help bankers, investors and insurers alike amidst increasing ESG adoption
- How To Manage Water Risk In Your Growing Business – Water risk is financial risk. So how do investors and business overcome challenges and manage water risk? Trucost’s Byford Tsang and Rochelle March expand and also share the benefits
- Environmental Risks: What, Where & When? – Hubert Thieriot explains his new venture, Environmental Risk Profiler, an online solution to identify, monitor and anticipate environmental risks – find out how it works
- Key Takeaways From The 5th China SIF Conference – The 5th China Social Investment Forum Annual Conference was just held in Beijing. See Dr Guo Peiyuan of SynTao Green Finance, a co-host of the event, three key takeaways, including the first ESG Chinese equity index
- The Future Of Sustainability Reporting – With GRI replacing G4 guidelines with the first global sustainability reporting standard, we sat down with Global Reporting Initiative’s Ásthildur Hjaltadóttir to learn what this means & future trends in disclosure
- Corporate Disclosure: Can We See Clearly Now? – Global climate targets are connected to day-to-day operations of companies and with COP 22 underway China Water Risk’s Dawn McGregor reflects on how clearly we are seeing corporate disclosure, the obstacles in our way & if there will be a sunny day
- Ministry Reform: 9 Dragons To 2 – What does China’s long-awaited ministry re-shuffle mean – who manages what and how? China Water Risk’s Woody Chan and Yuanchao Xu review the roles and impacts of the new Ministry of Ecological Environment & Ministry of Natural Resources
- Two Sessions, Five Highlights For Water – An ‘ecological civilisation’ is now embedded in China’s constitution and ministerial reform has been tabled. Find out what these mean for water in our review of this year’s Two Sessions. Pay attention or risk being blindsided
- Is China Taking Over Global Leadership On The Environment? – Top experts, from the founder of TECONET to the Head of Asia-Paciﬁc for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, share their thoughts at a high level panel in City University of Hong Kong. Their Sadhika Nanda reviews
Read more from Dawn McGregor →