Water Treaties – A Question of Rights
By China Water Risk 12 April, 2012
Sophie le Clue gives an overview of the water treaty landscape
In February 2012, China Water Risk provided an overview of potential geopolitical risk in relation to the transboundary nature of some of Asia’s main water arteries, many of which are sourced in the Tibetan Plateau. See Geopolitical Risks: Transboundary Rivers. The article focused largely on China and the proliferation of dams in the upper reaches of its shared rivers in South and South East Asia. A brief look at the issue however quickly raises the question of governance; that is water treaties. What are they, where are they in place and are they effective?
Two thirds of global freshwater ﬂow is shared
According to the UN, over 90 per cent of the world’s population lives in countries that share water basins. Globally, there are some 263 transboundary lake and river basins covering nearly one half of the Earth’s land surface and accounting for an estimated 60 per cent of global freshwater ﬂow1. In addition, about two billion people worldwide depend on groundwater, which includes approximately 300 transboundary aquifer systems.2
The importance of transboundary waters to individual states is embodied in the interdependencies created by such shared resources and this cannot be understated; now more then ever, as access to freshwater supplies globally face increasing challenges including skyrocketing demand, climate change, over and inefficient use of water resources and pollution.
What is perhaps surprising, is that despite the extent of shared water resources globally and there obvious importance, there are no international legally binding treaties in force today. Existing treaties take the form of bilalteral or multilateral agreements usually to provide governance in relation to a particular river basin.
Asia, share and share alike
In Asia, where water availability per capita is the lowest globally and declining, the situation is acute. With over 50 percent of the world’s population and rising, and about 27 percent of its freshwater water resources, South and South East Asia for example face increasing pressure on already scarce supplies due to economic development, rapid urbanization and population growth. A quick look at some of the main river basins in this region (expanding on February’s article), reveal the extent to which these valuable resources are shared.
Transboundary waters: a recent history of governance
There are currently two main international treaties that provide principles for the governance of transboundary waters: the 1997 UN Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses and the 2004 Berlin Rules.
The UN Convention is by and large based on the International Law Association’s (ILA) 1966 Helsinki Rules3. As a framework convention, it provides the principles and rules that may be applied to suit the characteristics of specific international watercourses, which can then be further developed through protocols. Two important premises are: the principles of equitable and reasonable utilisation of shared watercourses; and the obligation to do no harm.
Through academic discussion, analysis of wording in the articles and case law, the latter principle is considered as subordinate to the former and is4 thus postulated as one of the reasons why the treaty has failed to gain sufficient signatories to enter into force5. At the time of writing there were 24 parties in varying states of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, 35 instruments of ratification or accession are needed for the Convention to enter into force. No South and South East Asian countries are either a party to, or signatory to the convention.
The UN reports however, that in part because of its provenance, the Convention is widely viewed as a codification of customary international law with respect to at least three of the obligations it embodies, namely: i) equitable and reasonable utilization; ii) prevention of significant harm; and iii) prior notification of planned measures. These and other provisions of the Convention have, the UN indicates, influenced the negotiation of treaties concerning international watercourses.
In 2004, the ILA introduced the Berlin Rules on Water Resources, which goes beyond the UN Convention and the earlier Helsinki Rules. As legal scholar Salman M A Salman notes6, whereas the Helsinki Rules and the UN Convention establish and emphasize the right of each riparian state to a reasonable and equitable share in the beneﬁcial uses of the waters of an international drainage basin, the Berlin Rules emphasize the ‘obligation’ to manage the shared watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner7. Importantly the principle of doing no harm, which was considered subordinate to the principles of equitable and reasonable utilization in the UN Convention, is worded in articles of Rules, such that it is importantly considered of equal standing.
In Europe, the water treaty landscape is a little different in large part due to the 1992 UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Water Convention). The UNECE convention is also a framework convention and is intended as a key instrument for developing co-operation on the management and protection of transboundary waters relevant to UNECE member states8. It has been the basis for adoption of many bilateral and multilateral agreements, such that its success has convinced its Parties to adopt an amendment opening it up for accession by all United Nations Member States, not just UNECE states.
Bilateral and multilateral treaties in abundance
Since 1948, over 300 international water agreements have been signed,9,10 however, as Salman notes , with the exception of some rivers in Europe, none of the major basins in the world are governed by an agreement encompassing all states with interests11. Indeed about two thirds of the world’s 263 international river basins, plus transboundary aquifer systems, lack any type of cooperative management framework12. Clearly, an alarming state of affairs given the importance of water to us all.
Furthermore, although the UN Convention defines a watercourse as including groundwater hydrologically connected with surface water, the transboundary nature of many of the world’s aquifers, and our dependency on them for water supplies has to date been all but forgotten.
As a result, managing transboundary waterways is ultimately left to individual countries and states to make agreements with their neighbours. The obvious problem with this approach is the exclusion of some countries which may potentially be affected. As renowned water expert Peter Gleick points out13, the majority of such treaties are bilateral, thus many affected states may not be a party to specific treaty agreements.
The Treaty’s that do exist cover a range of issues including flood control, hydroelectricity, industrial uses, navigation, pollution and fishing, only 37% are estimated to address water allocation14. Furthermore experts suggest that key requirements are frequently omitted15.
In the region, of 27 treaties (Table 1 and 2) have been signed since 1954, covering a range of issues and various commitment periods in relation to the Indus, GBM and Mekong River basins, of which China has been signatory to only two. China’s main water treaties are/have been with Russia, Mongolia, North Korea and Kazakhstan (Table 2).
Table 1: Some Key Asian Water Treaties
|River / River Basin||Countries||Treaties|
|Indus||India, Pakistan||Indus waters treaty 1960. Pre 1960, two treaties on border disputes, one on water quantity|
|Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna||India, Nepal||Five treaties Between 1954 and 1996, mainly covering hydropower and water quantity|
|India, Bangladesh||Eight treaties Between 1972 and 1996, , mainly covering water quantity|
|Mekong||Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam||Seven treaties Between 1957 and 2004, covering economic development, water quantity, flooding and navigation|
|Laos, Thailand||Two treaties Between 1965 and 1978, , covering economic development and hydropower|
Source :Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database- accessed April 2012
Table 2: China Water Treaties
|Russia||Navigation procedures and construction on border rivers (including Amur, Ussuri, Argun)||Navigation||1905|
|Protocol between China and Russia for the delimitation of the frontier along the River Horgos||Border Issues||1915|
|Agreement on joint research operations to determine the natural resources of the Amur River Basin and the prospects for development of its productive potentialities and on planning and survey operations to prepare a scheme for the multi-purpose exploitation of the operations to prepare a scheme for the multi-purpose exploitation of the Argun River and the Upper Amur River||Hydro-power/ Hydro-electricity||1956|
|Agreement concerning co-operation in the sphere of protection, regulation and reproduction of living water resources in transboundary waters of Amur and Ussuri Rivers||1994|
|Agreement concerning principles of joint economic use of several islands and adjacent water areas of transboundary rivers||Economic development||1997|
|Agreement on rational management and protection of transboundary waters.||Water quality,|
Flood control/ relief, erosion
|Kazakhstan||Three agreements on management and protection of transboundary rivers. Treaty basin: Aral Sea, Iii/Kunes He, Ob, Po Lun To||Flooding||2001*|
|Agreement on water quality protection of transboundary waters.||Water quality||2011*|
|Mongolia||Four agreements on the protection and utilization of transboundary waters Treaty basin: Halaha, Bor Nor Lake, Bulgan, Kerulen/ Herlen He, Frontiers or shared water||Water quantity,|
Flood control/ relief
|North Korea||Protocol on China’s supply of whole sets of equipment and machinery for the joint construction of a power station on the Yalu River||1905|
|Protocol on work of board of directors and inspectors of North Korea and China Yalu River Hydroelectric Company. Agreement text is not available.||1905|
|Agreement on strengthening cooperation in border zones along the Yalu River.|
|South Korea, Mongolia, N Korea, Russia||Agreement on establishing the development and negotiation commission of the Tumen River Economic Development Zone and North east Asia||1905|
|Agreement on establishing the Development and Coordination Commission of Tumen River Area”||1995|
|Laos, Myanmar Thailand||Commercial navigation on the Lancand-Mekong River||Navigation||2001|
|Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Myanmar||Agreement on Providing the Hydrological Data during Flood Season ( Mekong)||2002|
Source: Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database* FAO Legal Office Water Treaties – accessed April 2012
In addition to the treaties themsleves, globally, there are well over 30 transboundary water management organsiations, relativley few however are in Asia, which is home to the Mekong River Commission (Cambodia, Laos Thailand and Vietnam) , the Indus River Commission between (India and Pakistan) and the Joint Rivers Commission (India and Bangladesh).
Notably, some treaties in this region have been successful, such as the 1960 Indus River Treaty between India and Pakistan and the 1996 Ganges Water Treaty between India and Bangladesh17.
Water dependency: love thy neighbour
It’s easy to speculate why China has not generally entered into water agreements with its southern neighbours, despite the international waters in its domain. Indeed, China is reportedly reluctant to even allow these downstream riparian states access to inspect its upstream water projects on international rivers18.
A look at water dependency ratios, that is the extent to which a country depend on external water resouces, make for interesting reading. Clearly, although China faces a water crisis at home, it is not reliant on its neighbours for water supplies, in the same way that many of its neighbours are.
A first glance at the issue of water treaties in the region, thus seem to indicate that there is little political will in China to enter into equitable water sharing agreements. This may or may mote be true, however the issue is undoubtedly complex; neighboring states are themselves often in conflict with each other over shared water resources and climate change and transboundary aquifers add a whole new dimension to the problem.
China’s lack of presence in bilateral and multilateral treaties in South and South East Asia is nevertheless another elephant in the room along with the damming of shared water resources – watch out for more on these issues in coming months.
1Transboundary Waters: Sharing benefits, Sharing responsibilities, UN Water Thematic Paper, 2008
2Transboundary Waters: Sharing benefits, Sharing responsibilities, UN Water Thematic Paper, 2008
3The Helsinki Rules were introduced by the International Law Association in 1966, providing a code of conduct with respect to the uses of waters of international
4Salman M A Salman, 2007, The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law, Water resources Development, Vol. 23, No. 4, 625-640
5The Convention shall enter into force on the ninetieth day following the date of deposit of the thirty-fifth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Secretary-General of the United Nations
6Salman M. A Salman 2007, The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law, Water resources Development, Vol. 23, No. 4, 625-640
7Salman M. A Salman 2007, The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law, Water resources Development, Vol. 23, No. 4, 625-640
8UN European Commission for Europe (UNECE) 2011, Strengthening water management and transboundary water co-operation in central Asia.
9Transboundary Waters: Sharing benefits, Sharing responsibilities, UN Water Thematic Paper, 2008
10The World’s Water, Volume 7, 2012
11Salman M. A Salman 2007, The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law, Water resources Development, Vol. 23, No. 4, 625-640
12Transboundary Waters: Sharing benefits, Sharing responsibilities, UN Water Thematic Paper, 2008
13The World’s Water, Volume 7, 2012
16Chellaney, 2011, Water Asia’s New Battleground, Brahma, Georgetown University Press
17Chellaney, 2011, Water Asia’s New Battleground, Brahma, Georgetown University Press
Read more from China Water Risk →