Sustainable Infrastructure: Towards A Diversified HK Water Supply

By David von Eiff 19 March, 2020

How can Hong Kong further secure its water supply? Dr von Eiff shares from Civic Exchange's latest water report

Local rainfall is under-collected, the true cost of Dongjiang water is higher than that listed in the purchase agreement & the economics of seawater flushing's expansion & future use are not clear
How about potential taps? Reclaimed water can have more non-potable uses but for desalination, Dongjiang water is currently cheaper & water reclamation is both cheaper & less energy-intensive
The report makes several policy recommendations: renegotiate the Dongjiang agreement, cover 20% non-potable uses with recycled water & reconsider the conditions for deploying desalination

While the combination of local yield, Dongjiang water and seawater flushing has formed the backbone of Hong Kong’s water supply since the late 1960s, the Water Supplies Department (WSD) demonstrated in the Total Water Management Strategy 2019 that it is beginning to pursue alternative sources, including desalinated water and recycled water (see image below), to ensure a sustainable water supply for Hong Kong.

How sustainable do you think these water sources are? Civic Exchange’s newly published report, “Modernising Hong Kong’s Water Management Policy Part II: Sustainable Water Infrastructure: Towards a Diversified Water Supply”, analyses the efficacy of each of these water sources in the local context of Hong Kong. It starts with the three current water resources of local yield, Dongjiang water and seawater flushing, followed by the proposed taps of recycled water and desalinated water.

Local yield

Rainwater accounts for approximately 30% of Hong Kong’s total freshwater each year.[1] Around 50% of total annual rainfall lands in the current catchment area, but only about 10% of that total is collected since most rainfall volume is concentrated in a short period of time, making it difficult to collect and store.

~50% of annual rainfall lands in our catchment area, but only ~10% is collected

While the expansion of storage for additional Dongjiang water would be useful, it would also be expensive. A review of the literature surrounding shape modification of large storage reservoirs finds this to be a non-viable option, as the scale and cost of modifications generally have a payback period of over 250 years.[2] Additionally, it would not significantly increase the reliability of supply in the face of climate change, as it does not reduce Hong Kong’s overall dependence on natural flows.

Dongjiang water

Dongjiang water now accounts for up to 80% of Hong Kong’s total freshwater supply. Since 2006, the Dongjiang water purchase agreement between Hong Kong and Guangdong adopts a “lump sum deal” model, which guarantees Hong Kong 820 million m3 a year, regardless of drought conditions in the Pearl River Delta.

The true cost of Dongjiang water is in fact higher than that listed in the purchase agreement

Of this volume, we typically use about 640 million m3 based on a 10-year average: the full amount was only used in 2011.[3] Hong Kong is required to pay the full amount stipulated in the agreement, regardless of how much water it actually uses, meaning the true cost of the water is in fact higher than that listed in the purchase agreement.

Seawater flushing

Hong Kong is one of the few coastal cities that maintains a dual-reticulation plumbing system and uses seawater for toilet flushing. For the last 60 years, this system has been integral in ensuring Hong Kong’s water security by offsetting a significant proportion of freshwater use. The economics of its further expansion and future use are, however, less clear.

Studies have found that the two most important factors determining whether seawater flushing is economical are population density and distance from the coast. As Hong Kong continues to develop and its population migrate into less dense areas away from the coast, that would make other alternatives more cost-effective for WSD and attractive to building owners, who would no longer have to worry about seawater corrosion of appliances.

Recycled water

WSD is looking into increasing the network coverage of lower grade water by expanding the use of seawater flushing and recycled water, comprising harvested rainwater, treated grey water and reclaimed water, for non-potable purposes.

1. Harvested rainwater and treated grey water

Harvested rainwater is the rainwater collected from surfaces such as roofs and stored for future use, whereas grey water is the water collected from showers, kitchen sinks and laundry machines etc. that can then be treated for use.

A typical rooftop harvesting system was only able to provide 25% of the water required for washing machines in a high-rise building…

A study carried out in Hong Kong found that a typical rooftop harvesting system was only able to provide 25% of the water required for washing machines in a high-rise building.[4] The amount of space needed to make a system financially viable also make harvesting generally unattractive and potentially impractical for a typical private building in Hong Kong.

…it will be difficult for existing buildings to justify retrofitting without incentives

Even though grey water recycling has a stable water supply within the system, the government has the least control over the installation of these systems due to their small scale and decentralised nature of installation and use. The economics and feasibility of grey water recycling are also site-specific, and it will be difficult for existing buildings to justify retrofitting without incentives.

2. Reclaimed water

Reclaimed water is essentially wastewater that has been treated to standards consistent with local water quality regulations. It is becoming an increasingly common water resource around the globe, particularly for potable use.

Reclaimed water can can compete with freshwater supply alternatives for a range of non-potable uses in nondomestic sectors

While treating reclaimed water to potable standards would not be practical nor economically viable in Hong Kong, it can compete with freshwater supply alternatives for a range of non-potable uses in nondomestic sectors. However, wide-scale implementation will face challenges in both public acceptance and the development of necessary infrastructure and institutional knowledge.

Desalinated water

Desalinated water is currently planned to contribute 5% of projected total freshwater demand on a stand-by basis. In spite of its drought-resilient nature, desalination is energy-intensive and potentially environmentally damaging, hence its large-scale use is not advisable in Hong Kong.

Dongjiang water is currently cheaper than desalination & water reclamation can produce high-quality water with less energy & cost

While Hong Kong lacks local water resources, its access to Dongjiang water from Guangdong is currently cheaper than desalination and may remain so under future purchase agreements. Furthermore, water reclamation presents a similarly drought-resilient water source that can produce high-quality water with less energy and at a lower cost. When viewed in this context, it is difficult to support the advocacy by the Legislative Council and WSD for significant investment in desalination.

Policy Recommendations

As reflected in our analysis, summarised in the Water Resource Snapshot, we see that the current plans of WSD are not aggressive or ambitious enough to lower Hong Kong’s reliance on natural flows, nor do they appear to increase the long-term resilience of the system in the face of climate change.

As such, Civic Exchange would like to make the following policy recommendations based on climate resilience, water sustainability, technical feasibility, public acceptance and potential for expansion.

1. Reduce reliance on natural water cycle

As the current Dongjiang water purchase agreement expires in 2020, the Hong Kong government can consider to renegotiate the nature of the agreement to maintain stability of Dongjiang water prices over the years, and set a lower fixed portion with a variable portion available as needed, which could even be charged at a higher price to encourage conservation efforts.

2. Set an ambitious vision for the deployment of reclaimed water in non-potable uses

Currently, WSD plans to deploy just 2.5% of recycled water for non-potable uses. We propose a more ambitious vision of 20% should be set to cover non-potable uses, representing savings of 197 million m3 or the freshwater usage of the entire government establishments and flushing sector.

3. Reconsider the necessary conditions for deploying desalination as a backup option of freshwater supply

Producing our water through desalination has the potential to substantially increase associated electricity demand, particularly once distribution is considered. Further, the potential impacts of desalination on the water supply could be more easily and cheaply met with improved conservation and policy efforts.

Sourcing fresh water using methods that are less energy-intensive & have less impact on the environment than desalination is preferable

Beyond the climate change links, researchers have become increasingly concerned with impacts on marine biodiversity and ecosystems linked to desalination operations. Sourcing fresh water using methods that are less energy-intensive and have less impact on the environment, in conjunction with adherence to strict water conservation measures, is preferable for both economic and environmental reasons in most situations.


Civic Exchange has a long-standing track record on local water issues, and in 2019, they addressed Hong Kong’s inefficient water usage through the lenses of water demand and supply in the two-part Modernising Hong Kong’s Water Management Policy. Read them online now!

Part I: “Conservation and Consumption: Towards a Water-Smart Hong Kong

Part II: “Sustainable Water Infrastructure: Towards a Diversified Water Supply


References

[1]Legislative Council Secretariat, Research Brief: Water resources in Hong Kong, June 2015, Hong Kong: HKSAR Government, https://www.legco.gov.hk/researchpublications/english/1415rb05-water-resources-in-hongkong-20150611-e.pdf (accessed November 2018).
[2]Mc Jannet, D., Cook, F. and Burn, S., Evaporation Reduction by Manipulation of Surface Area to Volume Ratios: Overview, Analysis and Effectiveness, 2008, Urban Water Security Research Alliance, http://www.urbanwateralliance.org.au/ publications/UWSRA-tr8.pdf (accessed 7 November 2018).
[3]Dongjiang water figures for these years were obtained from WSD information requests
[4]Gao, X., Kim, Y. and Lee, H.W. (2014), “Life-cycle Cost Analysis of Using Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Hong Kong Residential Buildings,” Journal of the Korean Housing Association, Vol. 25, pp.53-62.

Further Reading

  • Hong Kong’s Pricey Water Deal With China – Much is made of the DongShen Agreement’s price tag but discussions need to move onto more complex issues such as the city’s rampant overuse & leakage. Hear from Civic Exchange on HK’s ‘illusion of plenty’
  • Securing Water For Hong Kong’s Future – The Jockey Club Water Initiative on Sustainability & Engagement (JC-WISE) aims to secure long-term water sustainability for Hong Kong. CWR sat down with Dr Frederick Lee of the University of Hong Kong
  • Thirsty Business: Why Water Is Vital To Climate Action – Water is key to the shift to a low-carbon world. Yet, companies aren’t moving fast enough as CDP’s latest Global Water Report 2016 shows. Their Morgon Gillespy on key findings from the report and the need for still more action
  • No-Sense Climate Strategies: From DSD To HSBC – Hong Kong’s shortsighted & unrealistic climate plans will leave key assets & infrastructure exposed that mean the government, companies, investors and the public are even more exposed. China Water Risk’s Dharisha Mirando & Debra Tan expand
  • Hot, Thirsty, Sweaty & Wet: HK’s Future Down The Drain? – China Water Risk’s Woody Chan & Debra Tan look beyond current tensions and see very real threats to Hong Kong’s future from climate change. Get ready for a hot, thirsty, sweaty & wet future

More on Latest

  • Becoming Beautiful: Property Rights For Natural Resources – The Ministry of Natural Resources is creating a landmark rights system for each natural resource, from coal and gas to forests and water. What does this mean and where are the pilots? Find out in our review
  • Greening The Yellow River For A Beautiful China – As President Xi reiterates the Yellow River’s importance, Dr Zhanfeng Dong from the Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning expands on policies for “黄河宁,天下平” – a stable Yellow River, peace in China
  • Vast River Diversion Plan Afoot In Western China – With the Yellow River facing water shortages by 2050, talk of a diversion project has resurfaced – but should water be diverted from the Upper Yangtze watershed? Chinadialogue’s Baiyu Gao explores
  • The Evolution Of Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility – Chinese businesses are embedding ESG and CSR issues into their decision-making, but water gurus Prof. Asit Biswas & Dr. Cecilia Tortajada want more – from better reporting to stronger local enforcement
  • Managing Transboundary Water Supply Risks: HK vs Singapore – Does Hong Kong’s commercial contract for Dongjiang water offer as much security compared to the international water agreement between Singapore and Malaysia? Chenlin Zhao from the City University of HK explains why

David von Eiff
Author: David von Eiff
David von Eiff is an associate researcher of Civic Exchange with a focus on economic and public policy issues. Most recently, Dr von Eiff has been working on economic, sustainability and climate change issues associated with water supply management decisions. He previously spent 8 years working with a consulting company as a regulatory specialist in Environmental, Health & Safety Management Systems, having clients across a wide range of industries. Dr von Eiff holds a Doctor of Philosophy from the City University of Hong Kong and a Master of Science in Environmental Economics and Public Policy from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the United States.
Read more from David von Eiff →